BONE DAO
Primary governance DAO for core ecosystem decisions and protocol upgrades.
TREAT DAO
Rewards and utility DAO for distribution mechanisms and feature decisions.
SHIB DAO
Foundation DAO for community initiatives and ecosystem partnerships.
LEASH DAO
Premium governance DAO for exclusive features and advanced governance.
Overview
Doggy DAOs are the cornerstone of the Shiba Inu ecosystem’s governance architecture, providing structured decision-making processes for different aspects of the protocol. Each DAO operates independently while maintaining alignment with the overall ecosystem vision.All Doggy DAOs operate on Shibarium’s Layer 2 infrastructure, ensuring gasless governance operations and maximum accessibility for participants.
Voting Strategies Overview
Each Doggy DAO supports four distinct voting strategies, providing flexibility for different types of governance decisions. Proposers can select the most appropriate voting mechanism based on their proposal’s nature and requirements.Strategy Types
ERC20 Token Voting
ERC20 Token Voting
Standard Token-Weighted Voting
- Mechanism: Voting power directly proportional to token holdings
- Advantage: Simple and straightforward for most governance decisions
- Best For: General protocol decisions, upgrades, and standard governance matters
- Consideration: May favor larger token holders
veToken Voting (Vote-Escrowed)
veToken Voting (Vote-Escrowed)
Time-Locked Voting with Enhanced Power
- Mechanism: Longer token lock periods grant increased voting power
- Advantage: Rewards long-term commitment and reduces short-term speculation
- Best For: Strategic decisions requiring committed stakeholders
- Consideration: Requires token locking for enhanced voting power
Identity-Based Voting
Identity-Based Voting
One Person, One Vote
- Mechanism: Equal voting power regardless of token holdings
- Advantage: Promotes broad community participation and inclusivity
- Best For: Community-focused decisions and grassroots initiatives
- Consideration: May not reflect economic stake in the ecosystem
Quadratic Voting
Quadratic Voting
Balanced Power Distribution
- Mechanism: Voting power increases with the square root of tokens
- Advantage: Reduces whale dominance and promotes balanced participation
- Best For: Decisions requiring diverse community input
- Consideration: More complex mechanism but prevents concentration of power
Complete Voting Strategy Reference
| DAO | Strategy | Description |
|---|---|---|
B BONE DAO | ERC20 | Vote with ERC20 BONE tokens |
| veToken | Vote with veBone | |
| Identity | 1 identity 1 vote | |
| Quadratic | Quadratic voting | |
T TREAT DAO | ERC20 | Vote with ERC20 TREAT tokens |
| veToken | Vote with veTreat | |
| Identity | 1 identity 1 vote | |
| Quadratic | Quadratic voting | |
S SHIB DAO | ERC20 | Vote with ERC20 SHIB tokens |
| veToken | Vote with veShib | |
| Identity | 1 identity 1 vote | |
| Quadratic | Quadratic voting | |
L LEASH DAO | ERC20 | Vote with ERC20 LEASH tokens |
| veToken | Vote with veLeash | |
| Identity | 1 identity 1 vote | |
| Quadratic | Quadratic voting |
BONE DAO
BONE DAO serves as the primary governance entity for core ecosystem decisions and protocol upgrades.Purpose and Focus
- Core Protocol Decisions: Major protocol changes and ecosystem upgrades
- Network Governance: Shibarium network parameters and security decisions
- Strategic Initiatives: Long-term ecosystem development and partnerships
- Technical Upgrades: Protocol improvements and feature implementations
Governance Structure
Voting Strategies
Voting Strategies
Four Distinct Voting MechanismsEach Doggy DAO supports four different voting strategies, allowing proposers to select the most appropriate mechanism for their specific initiative:1. ERC20 Token Voting
- Description: Vote with ERC20 BONE tokens
- Mechanism: Standard token-weighted voting based on BONE holdings
- Use Case: General governance decisions and protocol upgrades
- Description: Vote with veBone (vote-escrowed BONE)
- Mechanism: Time-locked voting where longer lock periods grant increased voting power
- Use Case: Long-term strategic decisions requiring committed stakeholders
- Description: 1 identity 1 vote
- Mechanism: Equal voting power regardless of token holdings
- Use Case: Community-focused decisions requiring broad participation
- Description: Quadratic voting
- Mechanism: Voting power increases with the square root of tokens, reducing whale dominance
- Use Case: Proposals requiring balanced community input and preventing concentration of power
Proposal Requirements
Proposal Requirements
Submission Criteria
- Minimum BONE Holdings: 10,000 BONE tokens required to submit proposals
- Discussion Period: 7-day discussion phase before voting begins
- Voting Duration: 5-day voting period for standard proposals
- Quorum Requirements: Minimum participation thresholds for proposal approval
Execution Process
Execution Process
Implementation Workflow
- Proposal Creation: Submit detailed proposals with technical specifications
- Community Review: Open discussion and feedback collection
- Voting Phase: Token-weighted voting with multiple strategies
- Execution: Automatic implementation for approved proposals
TREAT DAO
TREAT DAO focuses on rewards distribution, utility features, and community programs within the ecosystem.Purpose and Focus
- Rewards Distribution: Management of TREAT token distribution mechanisms
- Utility Features: Development and implementation of ecosystem utilities
- Community Programs: Funding and oversight of community initiatives
- Incentive Structures: Design of reward and incentive programs
Governance Structure
Voting Strategies
Voting Strategies
Four Distinct Voting MechanismsTREAT DAO supports four different voting strategies for rewards and utility decisions:1. ERC20 Token Voting
- Description: Vote with ERC20 TREAT tokens
- Mechanism: Standard token-weighted voting based on TREAT holdings
- Use Case: General reward distribution and utility feature decisions
- Description: Vote with veTreat (vote-escrowed TREAT)
- Mechanism: Time-locked voting where longer lock periods grant increased voting power
- Use Case: Long-term reward strategy and utility development decisions
- Description: 1 identity 1 vote
- Mechanism: Equal voting power regardless of token holdings
- Use Case: Community program funding and inclusive reward decisions
- Description: Quadratic voting
- Mechanism: Voting power increases with the square root of tokens, reducing whale dominance
- Use Case: Balanced reward distribution and community incentive decisions
Proposal Categories
Proposal Categories
Focus Areas
- Reward Mechanisms: New reward distribution strategies
- Utility Development: Ecosystem utility features and tools
- Community Funding: Grants and funding for community projects
- Incentive Programs: New incentive structures and programs
Implementation Timeline
Implementation Timeline
Execution Process
- Proposal Review: 5-day community review period
- Voting Phase: 3-day voting period for standard proposals
- Funding Allocation: Automatic TREAT distribution for approved proposals
- Progress Tracking: Regular updates on funded initiatives
SHIB DAO
SHIB DAO represents the foundation governance entity, focusing on community initiatives and ecosystem partnerships.Purpose and Focus
- Community Projects: Support and funding for grassroots initiatives
- Ecosystem Partnerships: Strategic partnerships and integrations
- Foundation Decisions: Fundamental ecosystem policy decisions
- Community Governance: Broad community participation and decision-making
Governance Structure
Voting Strategies
Voting Strategies
Four Distinct Voting MechanismsSHIB DAO supports four different voting strategies for community-focused governance:1. ERC20 Token Voting
- Description: Vote with ERC20 SHIB tokens
- Mechanism: Standard token-weighted voting based on SHIB holdings
- Use Case: General community initiatives and ecosystem partnerships
- Description: Vote with veShib (vote-escrowed SHIB)
- Mechanism: Time-locked voting where longer lock periods grant increased voting power
- Use Case: Long-term community development and foundation decisions
- Description: 1 identity 1 vote
- Mechanism: Equal voting power regardless of token holdings
- Use Case: Community projects and inclusive governance decisions
- Description: Quadratic voting
- Mechanism: Voting power increases with the square root of tokens, reducing whale dominance
- Use Case: Balanced community representation and grassroots initiatives
Proposal Types
Proposal Types
Community Initiatives
- Community Projects: Funding for grassroots community initiatives
- Partnership Proposals: Strategic ecosystem partnerships
- Policy Decisions: Foundation-level policy and governance changes
- Community Programs: Educational and outreach programs
Participation Requirements
Participation Requirements
Accessibility Focus
- Low Barriers: Minimal token requirements for participation
- Community Focus: Emphasis on community-driven decisions
- Educational Support: Resources for new participants
- Inclusive Design: Designed for maximum community participation
LEASH DAO
LEASH DAO provides premium governance features and exclusive decision-making capabilities for LEASH token holders.Purpose and Focus
- Premium Features: Development and management of exclusive ecosystem features
- Advanced Governance: Sophisticated governance mechanisms and tools
- Exclusive Partnerships: Premium partnerships and integrations
- Enhanced Rights: Special privileges and governance rights
Governance Structure
Voting Strategies
Voting Strategies
Four Distinct Voting MechanismsLEASH DAO supports four different voting strategies for premium governance features:1. ERC20 Token Voting
- Description: Vote with ERC20 LEASH tokens
- Mechanism: Standard token-weighted voting based on LEASH holdings
- Use Case: General premium feature decisions and exclusive partnerships
- Description: Vote with veLeash (vote-escrowed LEASH)
- Mechanism: Time-locked voting where longer lock periods grant increased voting power
- Use Case: Long-term premium feature development and advanced governance decisions
- Description: 1 identity 1 vote
- Mechanism: Equal voting power regardless of token holdings
- Use Case: Inclusive premium feature access and community representation
- Description: Quadratic voting
- Mechanism: Voting power increases with the square root of tokens, reducing whale dominance
- Use Case: Balanced premium feature decisions and exclusive partnership selections
Exclusive Features
Exclusive Features
Premium Capabilities
- Advanced Proposals: Complex governance proposals with multiple stages
- Exclusive Access: Early access to new features and developments
- Enhanced Tools: Advanced governance tools and analytics
- Priority Rights: Priority consideration for proposals and requests
Security Features
Security Features
Enhanced Security
- Multi-Signature: Multi-signature requirements for major decisions
- Time Locks: Extended deliberation periods for critical decisions
- Audit Requirements: Mandatory audits for major proposals
- Emergency Procedures: Special procedures for urgent situations
Participation Guidelines
Getting Started
1
Acquire Tokens
Purchase the relevant ecosystem tokens (BONE, TREAT, SHIB, or LEASH) to gain voting power.
Token holdings determine your voting power and participation rights in each DAO.
2
Connect Wallet
Connect your wallet to the SHIB DAO portal to access governance features.
Ensure you’re using the official SHIB DAO portal to avoid phishing attempts.
3
Start Participating
Begin voting on proposals and engaging with the governance community.
Your first vote will start building your governance reputation and Karma.
4
Submit Proposals
Once you meet the requirements, consider submitting your own proposals for community consideration.
Best Practices
Start by observing and participating in discussions before submitting proposals to understand the governance culture and requirements.
Always thoroughly research proposals before voting, and consider the long-term implications for the ecosystem.
Regular participation in governance activities helps build your reputation and increases your influence in the ecosystem.